Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 18:49:10 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: nate@sri.MT.net (Nate Williams), freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It isn't easy being "green"... Message-ID: <199604040149.SAA15500@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199604040205.LAA23103@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> References: <199604032123.OAA15011@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199604040205.LAA23103@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > APM suspend/resume works on some machines in both -stable and -current. > > However, folks are having a difficult time getting updated to -stable > > and -current because of instabilities and other problems, so it's > > difficult to know which machines work and which don't. > > I find the comment about upgrading totally bizarre. I've bootstrapped > machines to both -stable and -current over the last couple of weeks, > and never had anything that couldn't directly be tracked to a bad sup. But you have some expertise that others don't have. Also, they are experiencing instabilities of 2.1R, and 2.1R + PCCARD patches that are affecting the upgrade to -stable. I suspect some of the instabilities are due to the PC-CARD patches, but unfortunately they are unable/unwilling to give up that functionality in order to test out the APM code -stable/-current. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604040149.SAA15500>