Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 May 2004 20:01:19 +1000
From:      Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
To:        Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
Cc:        freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unified getcwd() implementation
Message-ID:  <20040507100119.GA15782@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
In-Reply-To: <20040507092235.GA61837@stack.nl>
References:  <20040507092235.GA61837@stack.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 11:22:35AM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> (Re: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2003-August/001152.html)
> 
> > Yes, it's quite an old patch, and much has happened since it was written.
> 
> Mostly some fine-grained locking was introduced.
> 
> I hope I got everything covered. Here Bruce's patch reworked, that works
> for me. (even over NFS ;-))
> 
> Anyone care to share their view on it ?

Why is this necessary? Emulation of the Linux getcwd() syscall belongs
in the Linux emulator. There is also some fairly blatantly plagiarised code
in this patch.


Tim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507100119.GA15782>