Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:42:28 +0300
From:      Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r226687 - head/sys/fs/nullfs
Message-ID:  <20111024144228.GL50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20111024142245.GA73120@freebsd.org>
References:  <201110241353.p9ODrW99046445@svn.freebsd.org> <20111024142245.GA73120@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--dYbRCasfhpyZLUd7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:22:45PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 01:53:32PM +0000, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Author: kib
> > Date: Mon Oct 24 13:53:32 2011
> > New Revision: 226687
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226687
> >=20
> > Log:
> >   The only possible error return from null_nodeget() is due to insmntqu=
e1
> >   failure (the getnewvnode cannot return an error). In this case, the
> >   null_insmntque_dtr() already unlocked the reclaimed vnode, so VOP_UNL=
OCK()
> >   in the nullfs_mount() after null_nodeget() failure is wrong.
> >  =20
> >   Tested by:	pho
> >   MFC after:	1 week
> >=20
> > Modified:
> >   head/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vfsops.c
> >=20
> > Modified: head/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vfsops.c
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > --- head/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vfsops.c	Mon Oct 24 13:48:13 2011	(r226686)
> > +++ head/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vfsops.c	Mon Oct 24 13:53:32 2011	(r226687)
> > @@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ nullfs_mount(struct mount *mp)
> >  	 * Make sure the node alias worked
> >  	 */
> >  	if (error) {
> > -		VOP_UNLOCK(vp, 0);
>=20
> Maybe you want to assert that it's indeed unlocked at this point?

No, I don't, since the vnode pointer is already invalid at this point.
The vput() call in dtr released the vnode reference owned by current
thread.

--dYbRCasfhpyZLUd7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk6leVQACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4ibCwCfRusCwPjeHfURw4eduKBaKgkR
E7sAoLjo+IQl7ju/dSeagnxYoxzk35A/
=rR/d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--dYbRCasfhpyZLUd7--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111024144228.GL50300>