Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:12:55 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: read only / filesystem Message-ID: <20000825151255.A65178@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20000825111535.F548@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@lemis.com on Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 11:15:35AM %2B0930 References: <20000824002732.A45983@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000824101341.D66923@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20000824130404.A51338@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000825111535.F548@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 11:15:35AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: | > also, are there any benefits to doing this, or is the noatime option | > good enough? | | There are certainly benefits. It makes the system a lot more crash | resistant. This means resistant to hard drive corruption, right? It doesn't actually affect OS stability. jcm -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000825151255.A65178>