Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 16:23:27 -0700 From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com> To: snap-users@kame.net Cc: Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org>, darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, julian@elischer.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au, altq@csl.sony.co.jp Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 4629) Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing together ... Message-ID: <20010502162327.Z21020@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> In-Reply-To: <200105022230.IAA24233@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au>; from darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au on Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:30:55AM %2B1000 References: <3AF025A7.3F3C24B1@aurora.regenstrief.org> <200105022230.IAA24233@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:30:55AM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> IPFilter 4.0 will, as part of its general increase in kernel bloat,
> let you use BPF expressions for matching. There are other things
You mean "pcap/tcpdump expressions"? BPF "expressions" are literally
BPF bytecodes.
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010502162327.Z21020>