Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:20:51 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Samuel Chow <cyschow@shaw.ca> Cc: Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com>, dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca, Jamie Heckford <jamie@jamiesdomain.org.uk>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd_config vs. PAM Message-ID: <20021007232051.GA31301@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <01c201c26e54$f00f54c0$9284412f@SAMCHOW2> References: <200209272135.g8RLZ3We005877@arch20m.dellroad.org> <002e01c26873$3d717a50$3264a8c0@BONG> <864rc3f4ks.fsf@number6.magda.ca> <20021005155131.GA8769@luke.immure.com> <01c201c26e54$f00f54c0$9284412f@SAMCHOW2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:57:39PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote: >=20 >=20 > > BTW, is there a way to completely disable PAM on a system? >=20 > I was looking at it a couple months back. There is > the NOPAM compiler flag. Unfortunately, telnet and=20 > ssh does not obey it. I have some untested patch > at home before I got too busy with other non-FreeBSD > things. PAM is considered to be an integral part of the system thesedays; as such there's no support for compiling without it. Kris --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9ohbTWry0BWjoQKURAi3wAJ4jJojXscTtbYIqXjGbDABZNu9IeQCeJ4AH r74+zSGOCW6bZyzmg+ChAmo= =f2JO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021007232051.GA31301>