Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:19:33 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Dan Plassche <dplassche@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [maybe spam] Re: FreeBSD 1.x Binaries Work Except under Chroot Message-ID: <CAGH67wQ784ONnUzQERf44YXmf18ZQ3CsNr88dBL8egVSKJE7Zw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=x8OyNNsYfz-Ffb2F9JrRS3_NJ_kBZx5duzzOmAsN7aA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-Vmo=yzCz_jDhTVQ3kyHgxDnUTvzqZPp%2BsDSz%2BZWe7cYmpJQ@mail.gmail.com> <62153.1345056899@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAJ-Vmo=x8OyNNsYfz-Ffb2F9JrRS3_NJ_kBZx5duzzOmAsN7aA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 15 August 2012 11:54, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >> In message <CAJ-Vmo=yzCz_jDhTVQ3kyHgxDnUTvzqZPp+sDSz+ZWe7cYmpJQ@mail.gmail.com> >> , Adrian Chadd writes: >>>Holy. Crap. 17 seconds? >>> >>>Can we please go back to having it take this long? please? >> >> 386BSD was even better, and I have a machine that boots it in less >> than 15 seconds from power-on... > > :-) > > Embedded systems stuff will love you if we could slim the build and > binary/library size down by this much. > > Sheesh, compilers do a lot of work these days, don't they? > > Has anyone done a (recent) comparison of execution size/efficiency > given the evolution of GCC? That and (obviously) the FreeBSD source tree has grown.. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wQ784ONnUzQERf44YXmf18ZQ3CsNr88dBL8egVSKJE7Zw>