Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 15:38:56 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Unified getcwd() implementation Message-ID: <20040507133856.GF9990@isis.wad.cz> In-Reply-To: <16539.35825.496228.539599@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <20040507092235.GA61837@stack.nl> <20040507100119.GA15782@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040507105355.GA93808@stack.nl> <20040507112928.GA14419@isis.wad.cz> <20040507113654.GA94118@stack.nl> <16539.35825.496228.539599@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# gallatin@cs.duke.edu / 2004-05-07 09:15:29 -0400:
>
> Marc Olzheim writes:
> >
> > What does this have to do with the FSF ?
>
> Nothing. As the original importer of this file, I can attest that it
> was ported from NetBSD (and that it came from OpenBSD first).
>
> There's nothing really linux specific -- it was put in compat/linux
> because that's where it was needed, not because it was cribbed from
> linux.
ok, sorry for the FUD.
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040507133856.GF9990>