Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Oct 1999 17:53:11 -0500
From:      Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com>
To:        Justin Wells <jread@semiotek.com>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: was Re: chroot jail in pre 4.0 
Message-ID:  <19991008225311.829401D72@bone.nectar.com>
In-Reply-To: <19991008222801.8BD4B1D72@bone.nectar.com> 
References:  <19991008170540.A1618@fever.semiotek.com> <19991008222801.8BD4B1D72@bone.nectar.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 October 1999 at 17:28, Jacques Vidrine <n@nectar.com> wrote:
> On 8 October 1999 at 17:05, Justin Wells <jread@semiotek.com> wrote:
> > I have several daemons running chrooted on my box, and I am wondering just
> > how safe I can make things under 3.3/3.2. I will definately be using jail()
> > once that's available to me, but currently it's not..
> [snip]
> 
> If you want to test, see http://www.freebsd.org/freebsd/jail.html.
> There you will find patches for 3.3-STABLE circa October 5.  I hope
> to commit them this month after further testing. 
> 
> You still need to do all that other stuff I snip'd.  jail is just
> another tool to help.

Oops, I meant:

  http://www.nectar.com/freebsd/jail.html

FreeBSD on the mind, ya know :-)

Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991008225311.829401D72>