Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Sep 2000 23:42:28 -0700
From:      Chip <chip@wiegand.org>
To:        cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc:        "seafug@dub.net" <seafug@dub.net>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: natd does port forwarding?
Message-ID:  <39CAFF54.88010B25@wiegand.org>
References:  <39C6FCCC.D0103226@wiegand.org> <20000918225104.I367@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <39C70308.EF52766F@wiegand.org> <20000919000233.L367@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <39C84A4B.766B5B24@wiegand.org> <20000919232213.Q367@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20000921003240.B367@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Okay, all's well now when the rc.conf is set to firewall type
open.
When I change it to client or simple, the installed defaults, I
no 
longer can access anything outside my network. I have recompiled
the
kernel and removed the default-to-accept line, now the ipfw show
shows-
00100 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ep1
00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0
00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
65000 allow ip from any to any
65535 deny ip from any to any
One of my previous messages had the rc.firewall attached, I
assume
that is still available in the archive for review. I had it
running
the client rules for about 10 minutes then it mysteriously
started
preventing access outside my network. I switched between open and
client several times, with open allowing outside access each time
and client not allowing outside access each time. 
Any and all suggestions are welcome.

-- 
Chip W.	
www.wiegand.org
Alternative Operating Systems
"Crist J . Clark" wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 10:33:38PM -0700, Chip wrote:
> > [Attribution to me lost]
> > > Not only do you have the distributed "open" firewall running, but you
> > > must have built a kernel with the,
> > >
> > >   options       IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
> > >
> > > Which is not recommended. Other than that, no suprises.
> >
> > So, is it okay to go back and recompile the kernel without this
> > option? What effect will that have on my currant set up?
> 
> None. But when you actually want to build rules to protect your net,
> default deny is the way to go.
> --
> Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39CAFF54.88010B25>