Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:47:39 -0400
From:      "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: complete listing of CPUTYPES
Message-ID:  <48B9416B.6050903@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <48B9782A.5010300@gmail.com>
References:  <48B9351F.8090903@gmail.com> <d7195cff0808300933n55592cfer9aa30d141840f898@mail.gmail.com> <48B9782A.5010300@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> illoai@gmail.com wrote:
>> 2008/8/30 Aryeh M. Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>:
>>  
>>> I just switched from amd64 to i386 8-current on a machine and was using
>>> CPUTYPE?=nocona but want to know:
>>>
>>> a) Is this still correct for a intel dual core e6850 (3.0GHz)
>>> b) Is there a file that contains all the CPUTYPES and a description 
>>> of what
>>> processors belong to which type?
>>>     
>>
>> I think that's a gcc thing, more or less.
>> man gcc gives a pretty exhaustive list of the cpu types
>> (and synonyms) which you may set.
>>
>>   
> You can also see a list of CPUTYPEs in the examples:
>
> /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf
>
> core and core2 exist (in 7.0-RELEASE). I guess core2 is what you are 
> looking for.
>
Every type is documented in gcc(1) except core and core2.... do these 
actually do anything?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48B9416B.6050903>