Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 18:27:16 +0400 From: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> To: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Patch (not perfect but half way there) for DBIx::SearchBuilder... [Bug: 191734] Message-ID: <80A36579-08DC-4617-8180-8A2B142C0931@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53BBC5B9.60004@sorbs.net> References: <53B4C581.5060508@sorbs.net> <53B4F7DE.9090300@FreeBSD.org> <53B67F53.9000903@sorbs.net> <53BBC5B9.60004@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08 =D0=B8=D1=8E=D0=BB=D1=8F 2014 =D0=B3., at 14:19, Michelle Sullivan = <michelle@sorbs.net> wrote: > Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> First, >>=20 >> Thanks Matthew and Dimitry, and indeed Jesse is still listed as the >> maintainer - however I have had no reply from him over the last few >> weeks, I could be wrong but I think he no longer works for Best = Practical. >>=20 >> Matthew Seaman wrote: >>=20 >>> On 03/07/2014 03:52, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> Matthew, "Demon" (cc'd you two specifically because the patch = affects >>>> ports you maintain directly) >>>>=20 >>>> I created a patch a while ago and sent it off to Jesse and the = RT-Users >>>> mailing list to fix extremely slow loading of tickets for = Request-Tracker. >>>>=20 >>>> The patch is for DBIx::Searchbuilder->Fields() and you can see it = here: >>>> https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Ticket/Attachment/WithHeaders/733854 = (bug: >>>> https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=3D96902 ) >>>>=20 >>>> If it were to be shipped as an 'option' in FreeBSD ports would it = be >>>> attached to DBIx::SearchBuilder or RT 4.x? (the patch is against >>>> DBIx::SearchBuilder, but very specifically affects RT) >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>> The rt4x ports can't patch files belonging to DBIx::Searchbuilder -- >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> Thought so but thought I'd check... would be a bit complex to do a = slave >> port... >>=20 >>=20 >>> that's not allowed. The options are: >>>=20 >>> * Unconditionally patch DBIx::Searchbuilder >>>=20 >>> -- given the patch hasn't been accepted upstream and it looks >>> like it could have a deleterious impact in some setups, this >>> doesn't seem a good idea to me >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> Well actually I could dix it to make it case sensitive, (which would = be >> the correct thing to do)=20 >=20 >=20 > As I haven't had any response from Best Practical or Jesse I created > this patch, I did make it completely case-sensitive, and logged a bug = in > Bugzilla: >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191734 >=20 > (I also patched the docs with the warning about breakage as the = Makefile > is space limited) >=20 Did you file an issue for RT at https://bestpractical.com/rt/issues.html = ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?80A36579-08DC-4617-8180-8A2B142C0931>