Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:24:36 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi> Cc: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>, FREEBSD-SECURITY-L <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Risk of having bpf0? (was URGENT: Packet sniffer found on my system) Message-ID: <E0vXx4u-0004Y6-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Dec 1996 09:16:58 %2B0200." <199612110716.JAA01999@silver.sms.fi> References: <199612110716.JAA01999@silver.sms.fi> <9612101452.AA21942@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> <Pine.BSF.3.95.961210215417.9494P-100000@nap.io.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199612110716.JAA01999@silver.sms.fi> Petri Helenius writes: : I think one consideration here is that to run some of the desired : functionality, like dhcpd, you need to have them. FWIW, rarpd also needs to have bpf enabled as well, or it doesn't work either. It would be nice if that wasn't the case, but it is :-(. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0vXx4u-0004Y6-00>