Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:40:36 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-stable-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4 broke after pkgdb -Ff Message-ID: <44fy5vi6h7.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu> (KAYVEN RIESE's message of "Thu\, 17 May 2007 11\:37\:15 -0700 \(PDT\)") References: <464B114C.5080703@net4.in> <464B1D6A.1040809@samsco.org> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705160849530.8669@libra.sfsu.edu> <44tzubr4u6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705170901570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu> <44irarz7fs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <Pine.SOC.4.64.0705171135570.25365@libra.sfsu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> writes: > On Thu, 17 May 2007, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Please don't top-post. >> >> KAYVEN RIESE <kayve@sfsu.edu> writes: >> >>> so the "-r" option will be the significant difference for the portupgrade >>> comamnd, just verifying >> >> Yes. Otherwise, you may end up with some of the ports that depend on >> pango being unable to use the new version. >> >> Make sure you look through the UPDATING file to see if there are any >> other issues you need to take special action for at the same time. >> > > this guy seems to disagree > > jnielsendotnet:Try what I asked in my first reply (deleting and > reinstalling pango manually), and see if you can get any error > messages from xfce. > > If portupgrade -f is failing portupgrade -fr isn't likely to succeed > either. That's true. I seem to have missed wherever it was that you said that the portupgrade of pango had failed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44fy5vi6h7.fsf>