Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 14:36:54 +0200 (EET) From: Taavi Talvik <taavi@uninet.ee> To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de> Cc: Christophe =?ISO-8859-1?B?UHLpdm90YXV4?= <c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr>, freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Fore and VPI>0 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201181428540.55289-100000@valu.uninet.ee> In-Reply-To: <20020118132130.D97177-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Harti Brandt wrote: > That would actually be easy. My own drivers (for PCA200 and 155HE) are > NATM drivers with three additional ioctl added (to get the QoS values down > to the driver) and a couple of ng hooks that hook into ng_atm. From ng_atm > you can go to whatever other netgraph module you want. If you don't need > signalling (only PVCs), you are done. If you need signalling, well, you > need all the other netgraph modules (ng_sscop, ng_uni, ng_ccatm, ...). > > If you are interested I can send you the drivers and ng_atm to have a look > at. No, there is no need for signalling. Typical home DSL connections don't need any signalling. ISPs typically just set up 1-2 statically configured PVC's and various encapsulation over that. PVC autodiscovery would be nice, but that is not exactly signalling. best regards, taavi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0201181428540.55289-100000>