Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:08:42 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Sergey Babkin <babkin@verizon.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, attilio@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, prashant.vaibhav@gmail.com Subject: Re: Improving the kernel/i386 timecounter performance (GSoC proposal) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903280006510.12518@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <7362.1238195438@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <7362.1238195438@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903272303040.12518@fledge.watson.org>, Robert > Wats on writes: > >> In which case user application threads will need to know their CPU [...] > > Didn't jemalloc solve that problem once already ? I think jemalloc implements thread-affinity for arenas rather than CPU-affinity in the strict sense, but I may misread. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903280006510.12518>