Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 07:43:30 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@ark.cris.net> Cc: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml Message-ID: <200205311443.g4VEhUPi002113@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20020531121313.A20879@ark.cris.net> References: <200205302048.g4UKmDh27423@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020531121313.A20879@ark.cris.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If memory serves me right, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > What's the problem with referencing -STABLE's man pages instead ? IIRC > there're was discussion on the -doc according to modification stylesheet > to support references other than -CURRENT. The release notes for -CURRENT reference the manpages for -CURRENT on the Web site. The release notes for 4-STABLE reference the manpages for 4-STABLE on the Web site. Exactly as it should be. (It used to be that all versions of the release notes referenced the manpages for the most recent release. Clearly that doesn't work.) If you're saying we should refer to 4-STABLE's manpages for those cases in -CURRENT where there *is* no manpage, that isn't really going to work too well. As it stands right now, we lack the capability to specify which version of a manpage should be used on a case-by-case basis. Cheers, Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205311443.g4VEhUPi002113>