Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:38:34 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which build to use for Intel Core 2 Duo 64-bit? Message-ID: <eo6e9i$cf9$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <45A693EF.7070009@veldy.net> References: <45A693EF.7070009@veldy.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFCB76D8AAB4FFD168B5A1460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Which build should I use to build a native 64-bit installation on an > Intel Core 2 Duo (E6600)? =20 AMD64 kernel, SMP variant. Specific compiler optimizations will not yield high enough benefits to be generally useful but it probably[*] won't hurt you. [*] There was a period when there was a bug in gcc which caused it to generate bad code for certain processor optimizations such as CPUTYPE=3DP= 4. --------------enigFCB76D8AAB4FFD168B5A1460 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFprxwldnAQVacBcgRAl9IAJsFrYHgyuXkMeuLp0ZuHhpLbfVEFgCg/g0j yD7DFcsA71BbAWqGpgRYqRU= =KAy3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFCB76D8AAB4FFD168B5A1460--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?eo6e9i$cf9$1>