Date: Tue, 06 Aug 1996 19:50:01 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@freefall.freebsd.org>, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: I have 2 patches Message-ID: <32080459.167EB0E7@whistle.com> References: <Pine.NEB.3.94.960806184234.5893A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Samplonius wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Aug 1996, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > I'd like to submit and check in 2 pathches. > > they add functionality to inetd and ftpd$ > > > > Basically they allow each to run against a single interface. > > This allows a machine to present totally different services on the > > inside and outside of a firewall system. > > > > The patches are on freefall in ~julian > > or in www.whistle.com/people/julian > > > > I'd like to commit them soon (tomorrow?) > > > > julian > > > > > > > > xinetd (in ports) already does this. I'm against extending the current > inetd because of this. The patches to inetd are not extensive. I'd rather run with the standard item than have to introduce an external item into our product.. If you lookat the patch, and still think that it is too large then I'd be surprised.. It makes quite a difference to the work we need to do > > xinetd also has access control, and can limit active processes per > service. > > Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32080459.167EB0E7>