Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:43:55 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Steve Ames <steve@energistic.com> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/82086: openh323 and pwlib very out of date Message-ID: <1118436235.7847.7.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050610204200.GA526@energistic.com> References: <200506101930.j5AJUQcO071359@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050610204200.GA526@energistic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-0VKry7KTk5N1WkZAMbe2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Steve Ames p=ED=B9e v p=E1 10. 06. 2005 v 15:42 -0500:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 07:30:26PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Synopsis: openh323 and pwlib very out of date
> >=20
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> > State-Changed-By: pav
> > State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 10 19:29:52 GMT 2005
> > State-Changed-Why:=20
> > Could you create an unified diffs between existing and your ports and s=
end it
> > to me?
>=20
> See attached diffs.=20
Please, diff -ruN (unified, and include new and deleted files).
> I would also like to create ports for the newer versions
> of pwlib and openh323 but perhaps in a different port such as
>=20
> pwlib-janus
> pwlib-pandora
> openh323-janus
> openh323-pandora
How does these relate to existing pwlib and openh323? Are they API
incompatible, or are they forks, or...?
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Squish. Larger than the normal icky things, and twice as icky.
--=-0VKry7KTk5N1WkZAMbe2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBCqfuLntdYP8FOsoIRAivTAJ4td5ze+lPSdPqHHIShCMsA5zXIsQCfXUNh
OgzuSwgdqmrpjk2GZWyvf1A=
=Vf9Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-0VKry7KTk5N1WkZAMbe2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1118436235.7847.7.camel>