Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 17:13:49 +0100 From: Kurt Dethier <kurt-list-freebsd@androme.com> To: Derrick Edwards <derrick@uniquestrength.net> Cc: joe@joeholden.co.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Marwan Sultan <dead_line@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: VoIP behind NAT and FreeBSD Message-ID: <4571A63D.1020605@androme.com> In-Reply-To: <200612021034.45192.derrick@uniquestrength.net> References: <BAY104-F30F0B4D35C184F62F5B789AD90@phx.gbl> <45718A77.3090107@androme.com> <45718C19.2000809@joeholden.co.uk> <200612021034.45192.derrick@uniquestrength.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Derrick Edwards wrote: > On Saturday 02 December 2006 09:22, Joe Holden wrote: >> Kurt Dethier wrote: >>> STUN will only work if you have the correct NAT implementation on >>> your gateway. If you are using pf, you get what the STUN RFC calls >>> a symmetric NAT. STUN will not help you in such an implementation. >>> I'm not sure how the other NAT solutions on FreeBSD are implemented. >>> >>> If you need a solution for a symmetric NAT, you need something that >>> understands the signaling protocol and can add fw/nat rules on demand >>> on your gateway, or a media proxy (like TURN). >>> >>> Kurt >> >> It is entirely possible to use voip behnd symmetric nat, but it also >> entirely depends on the setup, some more details will help. >> > Hi, > I am not sure of your setup either, but I have Vongae working behind a FreeBSD > Firewall/Router using PF with NAT. Hi all, It is very possible to use VOIP behind a symmetric NAT, but STUN is not going to be any help. Depending on the setup and clients I have implemented a number of solutions over the past years. Unfortunately I haven't found a single solutions that always works. Kurt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4571A63D.1020605>