Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 12:50:08 +0100 From: "Greg Quinlan" <greg@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Linux not FreeBSD? Message-ID: <025d01beb725$37acd860$380051c2@qmpgmc.ac.uk> References: <19990612223456.B210@caamora.com.au> <199906121513.IAA25324@kusanagi.boing.com> <19990613172117.D1670@caamora.com.au> <3764AE53.4FB4A94A@telspace.alcatel.fr> <19990614181836.A19492@ipass.net> <37660EE7.FDC8F664@telspace.alcatel.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all, This might give people a little bit of a laugh (not really for this forum): Here is SCO (the Serious Commercial Organisation of the free software rip-offs merchants) Saying they are adding Linux compatibility.... well, well... could not be bothered doing their own thing anymore with free software source and decided to do some alignment with free software developers, and OS's so it wil make their product more attractive. But why Linux and not FreeBSD also? Well FreeBSD is compatiable with SCO (after they patched the OS to be compatiable with themselves ;) * SLS oss472a: Binary Misrecognition Patch ) They should atleast reciprocate!!! (very brief) http://www.sco.com/press/releases/1999/6849.html Greg ps. Patches to their last release SCO OSR5.0.4: app479a* oss449f* oss459b* oss463b* oss465b* oss467a* oss470a* oss469c* oss470a* oss471c* oss472a* oss475a* oss476a* oss478a* oss480a* oss481a* oss485a* oss491a* oss495c* oss496a* oss601a* And you were worried about FreeBSD stability? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?025d01beb725$37acd860$380051c2>