Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Jun 2003 10:43:07 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Matthew George <mdg@secureworks.net>
To:        Vandyuk Eugene <duke@irpen.kiev.ua>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Packet flow through IPFW+IPF+IPNAT ?
Message-ID:  <20030602104108.Q40213@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20030531122028.A16361@irpen.kiev.ua>
References:  <20030531122028.A16361@irpen.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 31 May 2003, Vandyuk Eugene wrote:

>    Hi.
>
>    On my FreeBSD 4.8 configured IPFW2+IPF+IPNAT and I use them all:
>    - IPFW - traffic accounting, shaping, balancing and filtering;
>    - IPFilter - policy routing;
>    - IPNAT - masquerading.
>    I want to know, how IP-packets flow through all of this components?
> What's the path?
>    incoming: IPFW Layer2 -> IPFW&Dummynet -> IPNAT -> IPFilter ?
>    outgoing: IPFW Layer2 -> IPFW&Dummynet -> IPFilter -> IPNAT ?
> Is this correct? Or IPNAT on the incoming packets run before IPFW L3:
>    incoming: IPFW Layer2 -> IPNAT -> IPFW&Dummynet -> IPFilter ?
> I think this path is more preferable, because IPFW always use not
> masqueraded IP-headers.
>
> Any help appreciated.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

I have ipfw compiled in and run ipfilter as a kld

the way it works is ipfw -> ipnat -> ipfilter

ipnat and all state matching for ipfilter is performed prior to ruleset
processing

-- 
Matthew George
SecureWorks Technical Operations



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030602104108.Q40213>