Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:48:43 -0500 From: The Anarcat <anarcat@anarcat.dyndns.org> To: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making bento recognize dual-packages pors (Re: cvs commit: ports/net/cvsup-without-gui Makefile) Message-ID: <3C40D96B.477700E6@anarcat.dyndns.org> References: <200201121943.g0CJhWQ26234@freefall.freebsd.org> <200201122105.g0CL5lQ85471@aldan.algebra.com> <20020112221028.GA1233@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> <20020112185412.S73815@squall.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will Andrews wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 05:10:28PM -0500, The Anarcat wrote: > > We have a recurring problem here. > > > > It's the same one as GNOME. Some ports do not *require* those > > functionalities, but one can add them as enhancements. > > > > Bento should be able to recognize such ports and build them with *and* > > without the additional functionality. > > > > Actually, such macros are already available. We have WANT_GNOME, we > > could instate WANT_X11. Then bento (or whichever package builder) would > > build 2 versions of the ports (WITHOUT_X11 and no flags). > > Patches, please. I wanted to make sure this was the good way first. So we need WANT_X11? I guess I could work some patches up. But bento needs to be fixed to detect those ports too. And I don't know where the "bento code" is or how it works at all. Given more insight on bento scripts, I could probably start working on that too. A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C40D96B.477700E6>