Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 12:32:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Jerry Blancher <flerll@kaschynna.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CPU usage. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980712122931.6374A-100000@kaschynna.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980712021429.2422d-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nope.. no top open.. I tried the exact same code (after being compiled on the machine) on all three machines. And when there are multiple programs like that running, 1% each makes a difference, and that was 1% for my code base, others use 2-3% more cpu. On Sun, 12 Jul 1998, Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 1998, Jerry Blancher wrote: > > > hello, > > I have a question, Let me set up the info: > > > > machine A: FreeBSD 2.2.5 > > Cyrix p200+ > > 128 Meg of EDO > > 4Gig bigfoot HD > > machine B: FreeBSD 2.2.6 > > AMD 233MMX with a extra 6" fan for cooling > > 64 Meg of SDRAM > > 5.2 Gig Ultra-DMA HD > > machine C: FreeBSD 3.0 > > AMD 233MMX with a extra 6" fan for cooling > > 128 Meg of SDRAM > > 5.2 Gig Ultra-DMA HD > > > > Here is the question, I have a program (a MUD) that I ran on all 3 > > machines, all 3 machines show's it using about the same Mem. Machine A the > > cpu usage would drop down to 0% but machine B and C would not go below 1%. > > What was changed between version 2.2.5 and 2.2.6 that would cause this, > > and what could I do to fix it( other then run 2.2.5 on ALL my servers? > > I wouldn't get to excited about 1% CPU usage. Perhaps you left a top > running somewhere? > > Doug White | University of Oregon > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980712122931.6374A-100000>