Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Nov 2000 02:53:27 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: libc shlib version
Message-ID:  <20001113025326.A79642@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A0FB7F1.4D0D1AC6@vigrid.com>; from eischen@vigrid.com on Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:44:17AM -0500
References:  <200011120651.eAC6paj79972@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200011121918.eACJI6l40407@vashon.polstra.com> <vqcsnoxszs1.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200011122037.eACKbJ540686@vashon.polstra.com> <3A0FB7F1.4D0D1AC6@vigrid.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:44:17AM -0500, Daniel M. Eischen wrote:
> 
> Why not find what was added and back it out?

Why loose the functionality.  Bumping a shared version isn't that big a
deal.

> Aren't we going to need yet another version bump for 5.0?

-current libc will have to be bumped at the same time it is in RELENG_4
as they are current at the same value.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
          GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001113025326.A79642>