Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:23:33 +0000 From: Chris Hodgins <chodgins@cis.strath.ac.uk> To: "Samuel J. Greear" <freebsd-hackers@evilcode.net> Cc: Frank Knobbe <frank@knobbe.us> Subject: Re: Idea about 'skeleton jail Message-ID: <42348525.8080302@cis.strath.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200503131051.40700.freebsd-hackers@evilcode.net> References: <1107178792.613.22.camel@spirit> <87d5u33j51.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <42342C47.209@cis.strath.ac.uk> <200503131051.40700.freebsd-hackers@evilcode.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Samuel J. Greear wrote: > Not a bad 'idea' at all, although I won't comment on semantics. I had > something implemented using fs stacking (in a very hackish way, and I > believe it's lost now, so don't ask to see it...) to implement per-jail > quota's that seemed to work quite well. > > Sam > Feel free to comment on the semantics. As I said before, I am not very knowledgable about filesystems and any insight or alternative implementation you can provide would be interesting I'm sure to everyone. Chris > >>This might be a very stupid idea but how about a jailfs. Now I don't >>know all that much about filesystem design so bear with me. How about >>something like this: >> > > <snippay> > >>SO the jail filesystem is configured at jail-creation time and uses the >>hosts files or jail files depending on the configuration. Might have to >>pass the config file into the jail command. >> >>As I said I am not an expert. Mabye one of the experts could let me >>know what they think? >> >>Chris > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42348525.8080302>