Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:59:42 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>
Cc:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: "buildig release" knob in make world/release 
Message-ID:  <200004122159.PAA40608@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2000 14:41:44 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004121439540.2482-100000@dt051n0b.san.rr.com> 
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004121439540.2482-100000@dt051n0b.san.rr.com>  

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004121439540.2482-100000@dt051n0b.san.rr.com> Doug Barton writes:
: 	Wouldn't it be easier to set the value of SANITY_CHECKING equal to
: "DEVELOPMENT" rather than have to remember some kind of code? Also,
: someone else suggested that "PRODUCTION" is a better definition than
: "RELEASE", and I agree with that sentiment.

No.  it becomes much harder to write PARANOIA >= 3.  Besides, 1 is
always 1, but people can bikeshed the whole PRODUCTION/RELEASE/STABLE
issue into the ground.

Warner




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004122159.PAA40608>