Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:15:51 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/hpfs hpfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/msdosfs msdosfs_denode.csrc/sys/gnu/ext2fssrc/sys/sys vnode.h ... Message-ID: <4224BF67.1070300@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20050301105230.GL3322@submonkey.net> References: <20050228233939.GB81082@elvis.mu.org> <53871.1109636277@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050301093736.GH81082@elvis.mu.org> <20050301105230.GL3322@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ceri Davies wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:37:36AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >>* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> [050228 16:18] wrote: >> >>>The ABI is already broken for filesystem modules as far as I >>>know, but if I'm wrong we can revert it. >> >>I'm not sure you're right but either way progress is good, and 5.x >>needs the work. >> >>How about we play nice after 5.4 or even 5.5 when 5 has more widespread >>adoption? > > > We already told everyone that we wouldn't break for 5.4. > > Ceri All that's been talked about so far with RE with regards to 5.4 is the merging of the fdesk locking, which I believe is complete now. No mention has been made of VFS locking. If there are plans to do that, we need to talk about them right away. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4224BF67.1070300>