Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:15:19 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing up the xen port - would funding help? Message-ID: <4A933B27.1080501@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <m2y6p8bvjh.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <d763ac660908220617h2d2a794ajb3a401d7402a4324@mail.gmail.com> <14889119.2221251120185215.JavaMail.root@zim.freshx.de> <d763ac660908240659w7b1e2575g9ee4152e6b58df56@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90908241040l313c59cfw3c2561901833d209@mail.gmail.com> <m2y6p8bvjh.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Randy Bush wrote: >> I've kept quiet, but I wonder why we're feeding penguins for dom0, >> when netbsd has dom0 support since 4.0 For my part, I am much more concerned with getting a working domU for i386 and amd64 than with *BSD as a dom0.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A933B27.1080501>