Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Jul 2014 21:32:33 +0200
From:      olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>
To:        =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgTGFkYW4=?= <rene@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "ports@freebsd.org Ports" <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: marking vulnerable ports forbidden?
Message-ID:  <53C581D1.8020702@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <CADL2u4gw7VSvuYwk_N26QnrOCyBd71=-R9U225372vYPEVz=Bw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CADL2u4gw7VSvuYwk_N26QnrOCyBd71=-R9U225372vYPEVz=Bw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-07-15 14:45, René Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> according to Freshports [1] there are currently 24 vulnerable ports not
> marked as forbidden.
> How about checking this list on a regular basis and marking such ports and
> forbidden and optionally as deprecated? This would inform users not using
> vuxml earlier about vulnerabilities.
> 
> [1] http://www.freshports.org/ports-vulnerable.php
> 

Hm, in case of mod/php5-5.4.30 I cannot find a vuxml entry or a hint about current issues in www/php5 or lang/php5.
Please double check against vuxml and the MASTERPORT before marking the ports FORBIDDEN.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53C581D1.8020702>