Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 05:46:03 -0500 From: "Donald J . Maddox" <dmaddox@sc.rr.com> To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com> Cc: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: too much confusion over kernel building Message-ID: <20010118054603.A42449@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <3A66C40A.AA7045CA@urx.com>; from kstewart@urx.com on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:23:06AM -0800 References: <20010118091839.7C8D13E02@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; <20010118042437.A41992@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <200101180927.WAA14914@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> <20010118045440.A42092@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <3A66C40A.AA7045CA@urx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 02:23:06AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > > The way I'm reading mods MFC'ed to Makefile.inc1 by jkh on 1 Dec 2000, > you can replace both of them with just > > make kernel KERNEL=MYKERNEL > > If you add KERNEL=MYKERNEL to your make.conf, it can simplify it to > just "make kernel". I created a script to do the full blown way > because I stood to high odds of flipping a letter in the middle and > haven't tried "make kernel" to see if it works. Ok, so substitute "3 more steps" for "2 more steps" :) In all seriousness, I can appreciate that simpler is better. Your point is well taken :) I don't think it makes a heck of a lot of difference, but I understand where you're coming from :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010118054603.A42449>