Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:01:38 +0400 (MSD) From: .@babolo.ru To: "Dave+Seddon" <dave-dated-1128917317.27d977@seddon.ca> Cc: 'Benjamin Rosenblum' <ben@benswebs.com>, Darren Pilgrim <dmp@bitfreak.org>, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which em(4) chips work/don't work? [Was: RE: dummynet, em driver, device polling issues :-((] Message-ID: <1128510098.391180.8753.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru> In-Reply-To: <1128485315.80787.TMDA@seddon.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ] > > Would an official person care to chime in about putting together a card/chip > > vs. em(4) bugs matrix? No sense, because bugs depend not on/only card/chip, but at least load. In my expierence quality of em interface depends on quantity of ipfw rules, pipes and on traffic load.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1128510098.391180.8753.nullmailer>