Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 22:17:53 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Per Jail Memory Limits Message-ID: <20091005191753.GZ2259@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4ACA4532.5000303@tomjudge.com> References: <4ACA0549.7030404@tomjudge.com> <4ACA2E0F.5010800@elischer.org> <4ACA3146.9090402@tomjudge.com> <20091005190213.GV2259@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4ACA4391.6020607@tomjudge.com> <20091005190934.GX2259@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4ACA4532.5000303@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--kUmJ0kIGcKOYePjT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:12:50PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote: > Kostik Belousov wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 07:05:53PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote: > > =20 > >>Kostik Belousov wrote: > >> =20 > >>>On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:47:50PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote: > >>>=20 > >>> =20 > >>>>I started to port this to 7.1 today: > >>>> > >>>>http://wiki.freebsd.org/JailResourceLimits > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>What are the peoples opinions on this patch? > >>>> =20 > >>>> =20 > >>>Since r194766, we have precise accounting for the anonymous memory, > >>>both globally and per-uid. If current jails infrastructure allows to > >>>set per-jail limits (and I suspect that it is), then you should > >>>just match these two facilities. > >>> > >>>The seemingly problematic thing is processes changing their jails. > >>>It can be done similar to how the uid accounting is done currently, > >>>by remembering which jail was charged in corresponding vm map > >>>entry and object. > >>>=20 > >>> =20 > >>Did this get MFC'd to stable/7? > >> =20 > >No, and never will be. > > =20 >=20 > Could you possibly expand on the reasons why this will never be MFC'd? One reason is that r194766 is intrusive patch. Another issue is that some VM algorithms are different in 7 and 8/HEAD, and I have no intent or incentive to do backporting. --kUmJ0kIGcKOYePjT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkrKRmAACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jr6QCfdji0cXBcH4027YxTsOTNtzlN SgkAoKKsoAlkW4zixxYy8xV63ak7coc2 =oWJH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kUmJ0kIGcKOYePjT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091005191753.GZ2259>