Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:03:16 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Atom Smasher <atom@smasher.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: intel i5 - core? or core2?
Message-ID:  <AANLkTikz8eO9=u2=yQJLo9ujjoQHAKFDG6xYmYUj_d=w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1008211213030.2000@smasher>
References:  <1008211213030.2000@smasher>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Atom Smasher <atom@smasher.org> wrote:
> hardware:
> =A0MACH: =A0x86_64 (LENOVO, 4313CTO, ThinkPad T510)
> =A0CPU: =A0 x86_64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 540 @ 2.53GHz)
>
> FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0 (amd64)
>
> in "/etc/make.conf" i tried setting "CPUTYPE=3Dcore" but as soon as i sta=
rt
> building things, lang/perl5.10 fails, complaining about "core" not being
> right.
>
> when i change the setting to "CPUTYPE=3Dcore2" it builds fine.
>
> is something wrong? i thought the i5 was "core", not "core2"...?

    I thought our base gcc didn't support core/core2 (IIRC gcc 4.4+
supports core/core2). Maybe this is a documentation bug with
.../share/examples/etc/make.conf ?
Thanks,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikz8eO9=u2=yQJLo9ujjoQHAKFDG6xYmYUj_d=w>