Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 Jan 2007 10:53:36 +0100
From:      trasz@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl
To:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc:        freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/108114: [PATCH] audio/jackit: update to 0.102.28.s20061216
Message-ID:  <20070121095335.GA45386@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl>
In-Reply-To: <op.tmhopxbz9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
References:  <200701201714.l0KHEkuf000451@freefall.freebsd.org> <20070120180124.GA40738@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl> <op.tmhopxbz9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 0120T2340, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >>Synopsis: [PATCH] audio/jackit: update to 0.102.28.s20061216
> >>
> >>State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> >>State-Changed-By: mezz
> >>State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 20 17:13:09 UTC 2007
> >>State-Changed-Why:
> >>We have about 20 to 30 ports that depend on audio/jack, so is this  
> >>update
> >>going to break these ports? We can't break these ports just for a port.
> >>
> >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108114
> >
> >I don't think this patch can break those applications; i tested only
> >audio/ardour, audio/xmms-jack and multimedia/mplayer, but changes to the
> >'audio path' are very small and i don't think that any of our current  
> >ports use the MIDI feature.
> 
> Can you provide example(s) how to fix in case if one of port build breaks?  

No, because i don't know any reason for a breakage.  When i wrote 'changes
to the audio path are very small', i meant changes inside the JACK itself,
not changes in applications using it.

> I can send an email to the maintainers and give them a week to test their  
> ports before I commit this patch.

Let me know if something breaks; i'll try to fix it.

[..]

-- 
If you cut off my head, what would I say?  Me and my head, or me and my body?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070121095335.GA45386>