Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:23:01 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex <root@Neo-Vortex.net> To: iampinetan@netscape.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The performances of OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.8-alpha Message-ID: <20050601171953.Y51985@Neo-Vortex.net> In-Reply-To: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> References: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 iampinetan@netscape.net wrote: > Mean Resp. Time (ms)/ Weighted Bandwidth (bps)/ Valid+Invalid connections/ Confirming Connections/ Throughput ops/sec <snip> > Apache(FreeBSD) 410.0 303272.69 300+0 50 761 > Apache(RHEL) 382.2 313600.49 300+0 56 765 <snip> > Apache(FreeBSD) 719.3 166083.41 600+0 0 771 > Apache(RHEL) 758.2 157416.85 600+0 0 769 <snip> > Apache(FreeBSD) 1077.7 110974.79 983+17 0 773 > Apache(RHEL) 1247.2 95514.28 989+11 0 750 <snip> Anyone care to explain why on FreeBSD (without OpenKeta) the preformance was lower than Linux for the 300 connection test although better for the 600 and 1000? (Just Curiosity) ~Neo-Vortex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050601171953.Y51985>