Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:43:30 -0700 From: "'Luigi Rizzo'" <rizzo@icir.org> To: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com> Cc: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: nested ipfw dummynet pipes Message-ID: <20030620114330.A98172@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533702741AF6@mail.sandvine.com>; from don@sandvine.com on Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:18:17PM -0400 References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C8533702741AF6@mail.sandvine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:18:17PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: ... > Thanks very much, I will check this. I assume this will be true > for IPFW2 rather than IPFW. one_pass actually affect both. the comment in parentheses refers to "layer 2 firewalling which is an ipfw2-only fature (bridge firewalling is also available with ipfw1) cheers luigi > It appears that 1.16.2.23, nov 21 2002, RELENG_4 has this > from the log: > "MFC: obey to fw_one_pass in bridge and layer 2 firewalling (the latter > only affects ipfw2 users). > Move fw_one_pass from ip_fw[2].c to ip_input.c to avoid depending on > IPFIREWALL." > > I will try this out. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030620114330.A98172>