Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:48:45 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opendir()/closedir() Message-ID: <20080905194845.GV2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20080905184032.GA71993@rambler-co.ru> References: <20080905184032.GA71993@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--t/OLoFZ234xJS33u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 10:40:32PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > Looking at opendir()/readdir()/closedir() sequence via ktrace, > I've seen supposedly useless lseek() syscall just before close(). > It's called from closedir(): >=20 > _seekdir(dirp, dirp->dd_rewind); /* free seekdir storage */ >=20 > It seems that free()ing libc seekdir storage should be done without > calling lseek(). >=20 > Other strange place for me is stat() before open() in opendir() >=20 > /* > * stat() before _open() because opening of special files may be > * harmful. _fstat() after open because the file may have change= d. > */ >=20 > What is the case when opening special file may be harmful ? For instance, tape may be rewinded. The whole opendir/seekdir/telldir probably should be synced with OpenBSD version, at least due to SINGLEUSE. I made this conclusion when I merged the OpenBSD fix for seekdir several months ago. But I also decided then that I am not a volunteer. --t/OLoFZ234xJS33u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkjBjR0ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4i5ZACgy0o29M427E7EXlZCGET3NWjX t2EAn1LfapVOUX8PBSaIZrKl1mU+QT2n =yCdT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t/OLoFZ234xJS33u--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080905194845.GV2038>