Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:29:48 -0600 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <ports@freebsd.org>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org> Subject: Re: p5-ack renamed ack, no entry in UPDATING Message-ID: <50F486DC.2040403@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83_45PJqF46dmvzKfXsFFSvpQ_LQF9mEVQUvKsBJ7ME6-g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CALd%2Bdcfj4-%2BVgD82Zg3YixwasYt1H=zs-eC-vTPsi0Wft5wO_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxg=c1UHbyNPhOk4-yj6RBkRwktsZMH8TuHE1H97djcpmsA@mail.gmail.com> <CALd%2BdcemEv1DRb03pM6YZCuq-1aBcN3M%2BaM9WYqF88DTXE0qCg@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_SYtx6CDUOrZ8Bm0cFoBQE0xVc5XPw34OAbmSsN%2BapdA@mail.gmail.com> <CALd%2Bdcckmt7RZjYpStzSiMLTM5imsguC4f-D5j4BqnVcQRYtpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgnp7SEC6_QBW5WzB_WCW4PGrSfvkjG6SEBDpv2BHpDU8A@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_45PJqF46dmvzKfXsFFSvpQ_LQF9mEVQUvKsBJ7ME6-g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7DCD5295C403D1F25C695297 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/14/2013 2:48 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 14 January 2013 19:27, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: >> On 14 January 2013 14:04, Vick Khera <vivek@khera.org> wrote: >>> My apologies. I use portmaster. I don't know why I typed portupgrade = in that >>> original message. Looking at the history file from my shell I see >>> "portmaster -o textproc/ack p5-ack-1.96_1" was used to correct the fa= ct that >>> p5-ack was leftover after a "portmaster -a" run. >>> >>> I agree duplicating the info in UPDATING would be unnecessary. I did = not >>> have it in my procedures to look into MOVING. I will do that from now= on. >> >> This should not be required. MOVING is designed for machines to read, >> not humans. IMHO portmaster should remove the old version (at least >> if given an appropriate flag). >=20 > I'm certain it does... Vick, if you can reproduce this error, please > file a PR against portmaster; this is a bug! >=20 > Chris This bug was reported to me for this exact port already. It's being tracked here: https://github.com/portmaster/portmaster/issues/15 Regards, Bryan Drewery --------------enig7DCD5295C403D1F25C695297 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9IbcAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5bnsP/iLZU2ftk4EDN+c0Imsr8tua akkbVpO5spuRDco9mS+1K4cT92Mb9hl5l4PBrKMyECQaxkDEZ0BF1DHUmcT1rRip XoatnV0rtXIaMPPHcSrYEnYsGvCTSb2d9sNFeOiQDB82fP5hdlhI6YKhQL8r6dvh nv8u+PRUaoctGZk6KS78/cHKqQvZQfoDj6uKZFAWt5wGy3MSqVGoLZKyNgApfaiQ UhoOc0qHVVFN44WPdFEg7ktqJJI46boD2RYJBdaKV7pLY/xW6aKRKASCghyMcDD3 nBcrG7LWmNxd1JFe6+bLtdaOqOaXb0wQ6fOnbca5axsrY4r5Qs7cdxTbkWMM3WAs 8E6e/a5qJPc4jhgbxuvyrUr7wyUWDKmPDE/S6aCrn4FfZWoAnTl8CqTikrisyFia OAnngC1m7dckOG2tm4D1U0wP6YQrcd4hU4DlYXgBfs5mgyr1Wp24U4UJO4lL1VLL SxM3oFZH0SosGpnaUuL5ok0fUne0MOZdaN8iFYMQ+62ECOsysFPYzUqwz+iNzhGM D7l2KdlClKivRRj0D7gAnmH1UIiPXqotNyLXg+dgbkOZUJWvmsPGdqHJH+GZJVo5 ZS1Rx78beGHk6sxBO5p8+16UaTHhk9jcRw3G0v83SGz52Sesedsu/xgLFe+XF+RT DdCbjb0W6IhMyOuLHe2m =7GTn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7DCD5295C403D1F25C695297--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50F486DC.2040403>