Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:26:48 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel GPU driver import Message-ID: <20120517212648.GV2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <4FB55E56.3020403@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120512213950.GZ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120517112315.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4FB52FF6.9040803@rainbow-runner.nl> <4FB55E56.3020403@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1J4USyVh4Jt5OGCL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:23:50PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 17/05/2012 20:05 Koop Mast said the following: > > I updated the xf86-video-intel driver in xorg-dev to support the situat= ion with > > this new patch, it now only supports the 15.0 patch or current after th= is is > > committed. > >=20 > > For people trying the 15.0 patch with regular ports a patch is availabl= e here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/intel-video-i915kms.diff >=20 > Koop, >=20 > IMO it's better to try i915 first and then i915kms if that fails. Both i915 and i195kms are present in the system. Your proposal guarantees that DRI1 driver is always loaded, making new ddx non-operational. It might make sense to try i915 if i915kms failed to load, only to hope to support (far) future systems where i915kms is renamed back to i915. I would not bother now. --1J4USyVh4Jt5OGCL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk+1bRgACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iGfwCgwZrxoVpoYO/Pazzzo9GjrAxu cLsAnAr98uFSUbZUW4xgCX9kJA6qh9Uf =8poG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1J4USyVh4Jt5OGCL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120517212648.GV2358>