Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Apr 1999 20:57:43 -0500
From:      "G. Adam Stanislav" <zen@buddhist.com>
To:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: Hopkins FBI]
Message-ID:  <3.0.6.32.19990428205743.00949dc0@mail.bfm.org>
In-Reply-To: <3727B08C.4AA80108@uswest.net>
References:  <199904272142.OAA09956@usr04.primenet.com> <372671F4.6C5F447E@verinet.com> <19990428052055.B31332@erols.com> <37279DA4.84E0B69B@uswest.net> <19990429095916.61702@welearn.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sue Blake wrote:
> Definitely! Anyone who can be proven to have been using a cell phone
> during conception should be liable for damages.

Question is: How can there be conception without the use of cells? Or
without establishing a proper connection?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.6.32.19990428205743.00949dc0>