Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:05:36 -0500 (EST) From: Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net> To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, David Fuchs <beastie@beastie.net>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INN vs. DNews Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10001220004340.27283-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001212350550.23487-100000@thelab.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > Dnews supports suck feeds, but also takes IHAVE streaming full feeds. With > > each new release of INN, my performance fell. > > With both CNFS buffers and buffindexed, my performance using INN has > greatly improved over previous releases ... the current -stable release, > unfortunately, doesn't have all the benefits of the current -current tree, > but its kinda like FreeBSD ... if you are willing to take a chance, > -current works very well, you just have to pick when you upgrade ... > Now this is all news to me - I left INN when buckets were first introduced (and had hardcoded MMAP) > > I do not know about the current INN - but at the time it forked procs to > > handle connections etc, whereas Dnews uses threads. Less over all ram > > consumption. > > Huh? INN never forked processes to handle connections ... unless you are > referring to an innfeed process for outgoing news? nnrpd's buds! 1 per user. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10001220004340.27283-100000>