Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:21:51 +0100 From: Alexey Shuvaev <shuvaev@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: congrlations to the freebsd developers Message-ID: <20071118201533.GA57831@> In-Reply-To: <473FE8B4.6090506@gmx.de> References: <473F250F.2030903@gmail.com> <473FE8B4.6090506@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:24:36AM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > 2. I meant features not formats and since I am using amd64 no wine > > Setting up FreeBSD i386 in a jail seems to do the job for most people. You can > have a whole i386 system in a jail and it won't even recognize it's running on > an amd64 kernel. I have gone this way. Well, everything (including emulators/wine) compiles and installs fine, but i386-build of a wine does not work inside i386-jail hosted on amd64 machine. I don't remember exactly what happens on start, segment violation or something like this, with core dump. I think wine requires rather tight co-operation with the kernel and it is not possible to launch i386-wine on amd64 this way. And you cannot load 32-bit nvidia.ko with amd64 kernel, if I'm not missing some new functionality.?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071118201533.GA57831>