Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 3 Oct 1997 21:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "John T. Farmer" <jfarmer@sabre.goldsword.com>
To:        gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, jfarmer@goldsword.com
Subject:   Re: Multiple serial ports
Message-ID:  <199710040116.VAA07559@sabre.goldsword.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 2 Oct 1997 18:54:13 -0700 John-Mark Gurney said:
>John T. Farmer scribbled this message on Oct 2:
>> Uh, actually, I've had good success with with several different brands
>> for multiple terminals/printers/front-end system consoles all active at
>> the same time.  Granted, I don't try to run the ports at greater than 
>> 56kbps.  Frankly, you don't need to.
>
>why exactly??  a friend was dialed into my machine (using a 14.4k
>internal!!) and we were sending some text down the line.. and he was
>able to get 8kbytes/sec+ over the link.. and this is with a zoom 14.4k,
>and a zoom 28.8k modem...  if I wasn't running the zoom at 115.2kbps, we
>wouldn't of been able to do that... and instead would of slowed a
>14.4kbps call...  (think if it was a 28.8k??)
>
>plus also, there is a MAJOR reduction in the latency of a connection
>when you run the speed faster..  for example, when another friend
>upgraded to a Supra 288kbps modem, and I was still on my Supra 14.4k
>modem.. the latency dropped 50ms JUST because his modem->computer rate
>increased...  and then when I went to 28.8k also (both of these are
>external), we dropped another 70-100ms in latency...

	Ah, increasing the line speed does not necessarily mean that 
	latency  will go down.  The latency of a 32k synchronous digital
	link (FR connection, for example) is usually less than the 
	latency of a 33.6k analog modem connection.  A lot of the 
	latency reduction in your example is due to difference between
	14.4 & 28.8 modems.  Modem brnad will also play a factor, not
	to mention the effect of flow control on each leg...

>this also brings up that kernel ppp (pppd) is usually much lower latency
>than iij-ppp...  the friend with his internal 14.4k (first example) and
>my extern zoom 28.8k, we were able to knock off at least 20ms off ping
>times because he went from iij-ppp over to ppp...  the last time we had
>the connection up (he's moved, and much better connected) we were able
>to do 140ms ping times over the 14.4k connection...

	Yes, this is a known factor that can be accounted for & tuned
	for.

>these may not seem much, but when your used to do typing of a wireless
>ricochet modem, when at BEST will give you 350ms, mostly 400-450ms, you
>REALLY becom aware of the problems with latency...
>
>of course, then you just need to go FR or ISDN, and it'll be much
>better..
>

Which brings me to this question:  To whit, What the devil does any
of this have to do with the issue/problem that was being discussed?
The issue was dealng with multiple consoles on servers, routers, etc.
located locally and/or remotely.  The basic "plug a terminal into the
console serial port" of your cisco(s), but for multiple devices.

Anyway, this discussion has wandered far, far afield of freebsd-related
hardware issues.  I propose to declare it buried...

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Farmer			Proprietor, GoldSword Systems
jfarmer@goldsword.com		Public Internet Access in East Tennessee
dial-in (423)470-9953		for info, e-mail to info@goldsword.com
	Network Design, Internet Services & Servers, Consulting



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710040116.VAA07559>