Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:58:15 +0800 From: "Daniel Marsh" <daniel@stiw.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defragmentation in FreeBSD 4.11 Message-ID: <op.suog3dbwjjurwa@spock.enterprise.prvt> In-Reply-To: <200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com> References: <200507281157.42688.bob89@eng.ufl.edu> <200507290913490593.03B78D69@sentry.24cl.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:13:49 +0800, MikeM <the.lists@mgm51.com> wrote: > On 7/28/2005 at 11:57 AM Bob Johnson wrote: > > |Microsoft used to claim that NTFS doesn't need defragmentation. > |Compared to MSDOSFS, that's a reasonably accurate statement, but > |if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented. > ============= > > The process of installing Windows on a clean disk leaves the disk in > need of defragmenting. As he said, "if you push it hard enough, it will still become fragmented"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.suog3dbwjjurwa>