Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2000 00:16:12 +0100 From: Dermot McNally <dermot@mcnally.de> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Subject: Re: PPPoE connection almost working Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20000207000333.00b04c70@tim> In-Reply-To: <200002060053.AAA37872@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> References: <Message from Dermot McNally <dermot@mcnally.de> <4.2.0.58.20000205001643.00afb778@tim>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 00:53 06.02.2000 +0000, Brian Somers wrote: > > dsl: > > set device PPPoE:ed0 > > set mru 1492 > > set mtu 1942 > >Spot the deliberate mistake... hence the warning in the log :*] Yup, I spotted that too afterwards. Fixing it cured the warning, as you'd expect, but had otherwise no effect. > > 23:14:41.096562 0:0:e8:4f:be:4b Broadcast 8863 32: PPPoE PADI v1, type 1, > > sess 0 len 12 [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq 004888c0] > > 23:14:41.141794 0:d0:c0:f9:b6:23 0:0:e8:4f:be:4b 8863 67: PPPoE PADO v1, > > type 1, sess 0 len 47 [Service-Name] [Host-Uniq 004888c0] [AC-Name > > MUNC12-nrp2] [AC-Cookie 372992470f60c417cd68e17dcde89eb4] > >This is the sort of thing I get when testing locally - the -current >tcpdump looks a bit different as it's been upgraded and the tcpdump >people added pppoe support (they mustn't have liked the look of my >output :-): Some people are just fussy - your output beats what was there before. >So as you can see, the local side *should* be sending a PADR. That's what I would have thought. One difference between us is that the PADO in your case specifies a service name, whereas mine doesn't (nor does my PADI, because I don't know what name to use...). >I don't really know why the PPPoE node isn't responding to the PADO. >it looks good from here. > >Are there any odd looking kernel messages on your console or in >/var/log/messages ? [checks] Nope. Right, I think I'll do the following: * Assume that MAC Address affinity isn't the problem - if it was, I probably wouldn't get a PADO, right? * Update the box to current. I wanted to do it anyway, and it'll bring my configuration a little closer to yours. * If I really have to, I'll try packet-sniffing a working connection from Windows. This will be a pain, because the "modem" Telekom supplies is intended to connect direct to a NIC, so to connect it correctly to a hub requires a crossed over cable that I don't currently have. Still, if we don't get anywhere by other means, I'll try this route. It will at least tell me if the official software specifies a service name in its PADI. Thanks for the ideas (not to mention the software), Dermot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.20000207000333.00b04c70>