Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:13:07 -0400 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openldap-2.4.35: "failed to start slapd" Message-ID: <20130429071307.50874b19@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <517E0443.2050804@delphij.net> References: <20130428070851.60d08788@scorpio> <CADLo839jkJOAh4nNPvn8_2VMLEuaf8%2BoKW2ibnPtM9rmqU7ghw@mail.gmail.com> <20130428131704.1eb14721@scorpio> <CADLo8382V97nGiTq4wMa_R_EXcjKpdGEZv3dEkBgrUeUwJ5yDA@mail.gmail.com> <517E0443.2050804@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:25:23 -0700 Xin Li articulated: > This is weird. We do have some similar construct for the server > package -- if the package is being removed, the daemon would be > stopped. > > I haven't seen similar issue in the past, what's the BDB version used > with OpenLDAP? It is using "db46" although I have both "db48" and "db5" on my system. I would like to switch everything over to using "db5"; however, I am not sure how to accomplish that with openldap. I did see a patch for Debian a while back though. In any case, this is the first time this has happened in over 12 years of using and updating "openldap". It may have just been a fluke. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130429071307.50874b19>