Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:02:04 -0500
From:      Duane Winner <dwinner-lists@att.net>
To:        Roberto Nunnari <roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch>
Cc:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: need ipfw clarification
Message-ID:  <4203D4BC.30409@att.net>
In-Reply-To: <4202834D.7030000@supsi.ch>
References:  <42028032.2020701@att.net> <4202834D.7030000@supsi.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Roberto,

Just to make sure I understand though, I only need to be concerned 
"forwarding" and "forward rules" if I'm setting up a multi-homed host 
(i.e., router), is this correct?

If I'm just using ipfw for  single-host based firewall protection, then 
forwarding doesn't apply, right?

Thanks again,
Duane



Roberto Nunnari wrote:

> Hi Duane.
>
> I had the same problem.. With 5.2.1 I had working forward rules
> and that were broke with 5.3
>
> after some fiddling I managed to have that work again.. just
> add them to your kernel:
>
> options         IPFIREWALL
> options         IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
> options         IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
> options         IPFIREWALL_FORWARD
>
> if you don't add them to your kernel, forwarding in ipfw will
> be disabled.
>
> Ciao.
>
>
> Duane Winner wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I noticed that after enabling firewall in my kernel (5.3-release), my 
>> dmesg now gives me this:
>>
>> ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, 
>> default to accept, logging limited to 5 packets/entry by default
>>
>>
>> On 5.2.1, I used to get this:
>>
>> ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, 
>> default to accept, logging disabled
>>
>> If both cases, I am adding this to my KERNEL config:
>>
>> options         IPFIREWALL
>> options         IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT
>>
>>
>> It seems that the major difference between 5.2.1 and 5.3 is that now 
>> rule-based forwarding is disabled.
>>
>> Is this correct? And what exactly is rule-based forwarding? I'm 
>> guessing that it doesn't really apply to my situation, as in these 
>> cases, I am using IPFW to create a deny all inbound to my laptop when 
>> I'm on the road. But I just want to make sure.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> DW
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
>> "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4203D4BC.30409>