Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 03:38:51 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ian Lord <mailing-lists@msdi.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug ?: SCHED_4BSD VS SCHED_ULE Message-ID: <20051104083850.GA17364@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051103225321.0252cc58@pop.msdi.ca> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20051103225321.0252cc58@pop.msdi.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:58:58PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I am running amd64 version on a Dell 2850 Dual Xeon processor with emt64 >=20 > as soon as I turn on SCHED_ULE instead of SCHED_4BSD in rc.conf, the=20 > system starts to behave strangely. >=20 > During boot, named and sshd can't start normally, system is unstable, etc >=20 > Is that a known bug or isnt it suppose to work anyway on this kind of=20 > system ? You forgot to mention what version of FreeBSD you're running. Also, you don't control the scheduler from rc.conf, it's compiled into your kernel. Anyway, SCHED_ULE is better on 6.0 than on previous releases, but it's still not officially supported, and there are some known problems with it. Kris --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDax4aWry0BWjoQKURAjTJAJ4itSHERMvtfoptf54q1kB5Oym78QCdGM97 U7bqUbmtYDiJXj6nxMSpBgE= =Hz6j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051104083850.GA17364>